Subject	Wrong... SMZs came later... I believe 94-95 and some in 96 (n/m)
Posted by	Grec (East Bay, CA) on August 22, 2000 at 2:03 PM
	This message has been viewed 11 times.
In Reply To	It's not an SMZ if it is a 95 TT, only 90-91 SMZs' n/m posted by ZonaZ on August 22, 2000 at 01:55 PM
Message
Follow Ups	WHY would anyone mod their SMZ? link - Brian(CA) 08:19:19 08/22/00 One of the nicest Zs I know is a *modded* SR-71>> - Dallas DamonZ 08:26:19 08/22/00 Would that one be #007? ;) - ZX_man 09:30:14 08/22/00 Yup, yup......very nice. (n/m) - Mal1ce 09:31:28 08/22/00 I don't see anything wrong with it. (n/m) - NV(Looking for next car) 08:27:00 08/22/00 when a stg.III Z blows by them... :-) (n/m) - Bernie 08:38:54 08/22/00 Nice quote, "THIS IS AN AWSOME MACHINE WITH NO MERCY ...":P (n/m) - HAYATO 08:56:27 08/22/00 It's not an SMZ if it is a 95 TT, only 90-91 SMZs' n/m - ZonaZ 13:55:48 08/22/00 Wrong... SMZs came later... I believe 94-95 and some in 96 (n/m) - Grec (East Bay, CA) 14:03:34 08/22/00 SMZ's only in 95 and some in 96 - Avalon Ent - Racing Division 14:30:35 08/22/00 That car is on page 123 of Sept DuPont Registry. (n/m) - drp 16:31:22 08/22/00 I wouldn't, but the darkside calls hard on the SMZ owner - BG in Detroit 20:53:53 08/22/00
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.